Offshore Wind Energy is Still a Non-starter in India
Industry is sceptical about the success due to high
costs and cumbersome procedures involved
While offshore turbines deliver 50% higher plant load
factor (a measure of capacity utilisation) than onshore farms because of higher
wind speeds at sea, the capital cost of tapping offshore wind could be over .
30 crore a MW, five times that of onshore.
“So, we would require incentives to make it
attractive,” said Sumant Sinha, founder chairman and CEO of the Goldman
Sachsbacked ReNew Wind Power.
A call for more incentives than what is offered now
could make it a non-starter. More so, because of the terrible financial
condition of state distribution utilities. The Tamil Nadu Electricity Board,
for example, owes over . 1,000 crore to wind energy players.
Asenior official in the ministry of renewable energy
agreed that the higher expense means that the government is unlikely to push the
offshore case any time soon.
“Given the condition of our distribution companies,
we can’t expect them to pay such rates,” he said, requesting anonymity. The
focus for Ramesh Kymal, CMD of Spain-based Gamesa, is the immense potential
onshore. Even if India ’s
wind energy potential is taken to be just 60,000 MW, a conservative estimate,
only a fourth of that has been fulfilled. Also, Kymal said offshore wind needs
clearances from 10 departments.
“You have to deal with bureaucracy and red tapism.
And evacuation is also going to be a key issue.”
The likes of Gamesa, Siemens, Vestas, Suzlon-owned
REpower and Areva, all of whom have significant India presence, have driven
offshore wind in global markets, particularly Europe. Industry information
provider Bloomberg New Energy Finance estimates offshore wind capacity was 3.8
GW by the end of 2011.
And, since 2009, over $24 billion has been invested
in offshore wind projects, with the UK ,
Denmark and the Netherlands
leading the race. China
wants to expand its offshore wind power installed capacity to 5 GW by 2015 and
30 GW by 2020, according to the Chinese Renewable Energy Industries
Association. Suzlon Energy CFO Robin Banerjee, however, seemed less sceptical
about offshore wind in India .
He said his company would be prepared to participate
in offshore projects as and when they come up in India , but declined to discuss
specifics. The company expects the offshore market’s global share in total
installations to increase from around 4% in 2010 to 11% in 2016, driven by
northern Europe and Asia . Huge offshore
installations in the UK
(around 18 GW) and Germany
(around 10 GW) would hold the key. In overseas offshore markets, Suzlon
believes, the biggest challenge in the short term is the insufficient
transmission infrastructure. The first step toward any future in offshore wind
power was taken only recently. That was when the Centre for Wind Energy
Technology, a Chennaibased Government of India agency, put up its first
offshore mast in Dhanushkodi, off Tamil Nadu’s coast. CWET’s report, prepared
with a Scottish agency’s help, has identified Dhanushkodi, Ramnad and
Kanyakumari as areas with the highest potential.
Tamil Nadu accounts for 50% of India ’s wind
power generation capacity.
Gomathi Nayagam, CWET’s executive director, said if
executed with Indian engineering project contractors, offshore wind is likely
to be cheaper than in Europe and America . The Tamil Nadu Energy
Development Agency, which promotes renewable energy in the state, has moved the
Centre for permission to do more.
“We are hopeful in the coming year that at least the
demonstration projects will come up,” said Sudeep Jain, its chairman and MD.
Ashish Sethia, head of Research-India, Bloomberg New Energy Finance, said even
the demonstration projects have to be developed differently in India . “In Europe , power utility companies have developed, owned and
operated a majority of projects as these are capital intensive and also require
setting up of associated transmission systems. However, in India , initial
demonstration projects could be done by turbine manufacturers themselves (maybe
through one of their group companies) or large oil and gas exploration and
production companies.”
Source: ET
No comments:
Post a Comment